The US ratings board – the Motion Picture Association of America – has jut handed down an “R” rating to new comedy Year One.
The filmmakers, including Judd Apatow and director Harold Ramis, had been campaigning for a PG-13 in order to grab a wider audience. But the MPAA decided that because of “some sexual content and language,” the R rating had to stay on the film in its current form.
Apatow and Ramis now face a choice – stick with the given certificate or edit the film. Here’s how some other filmmakers reacted to decisions handed down over the years.
The film: Midnight Cowboy (1969)
The rating: X
The story: Cowboy, directed by John Schlesinger, was the first ever studio film to be slapped with an X rating (now known as an NC-17), which had mostly been reserved for porn movies. It meant most cinemas refused to carry the film and no one younger than 17 could get in at all.
To be fair to the MPAA, some of the board were prepared to go with an R rating (those under 17 can get in with an adult), but the boss of United Artists decided to apply the X himself.
Still, Schlesinger and co had the last laugh – not only did the movie go on to win both Best Director and Best Picture at the Oscars, but he was able to re-submit it a year after its first release – with no changes, mind – and grab an R.
Did it affect the box office? Didn’t seem to. Despite the early X and limited screens at first, people were drawn to the controversy and the quality of the movie itself.
The verdict: Draw! Everybody won.
Technology
Entertainment
Music
Creative
Sport & Auto
- About Future
- Jobs
- PR
- Advertising
- Digital Future
- Privacy Policy
- Cookies Policy
- Terms & Conditions
- Subscriptions
- Investor Relations
- Contact Future
© Future Publishing Limited, Beauford Court, 30 Monmouth Street, Bath BA1 2BW. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.





Comments
Mart15
Apr 10th 2009, 13:49
Everyone should praise the modern BBFC, if only because we don't have to put up with this kind of censorship.
Alert a moderator
fishosaurus
Apr 11th 2009, 12:31
I agree with Mart15. The MPAA are a bunch of hypocritical catholic mothers who are happy to let people watch guns, violence, homophobia, mysogeny and other general religious nastiness (which ISN'T natural and most dont do in real life), but nearly pass out at the idea of two people having sex (which IS natural and most do in real life). This leads to the common ridiculous situation of a film filled with bloody violence, horror and suffering depicting a sex scene with their bottom halves under the covers and their top halves fully clothed! WHO HAS SEX LIKE THAT! Just because they are moronically ashamed and embarressed by sex doesn't mean normal people are! IDIOTS.
Alert a moderator
fishosaurus
Apr 11th 2009, 12:35
The MPAA are a bunch of hypocritical catholic mothers trying to force their ridiculous dogmatic nonsense (sex is evil - but guns, violence, torture, horror, homophobia, mysogeny etc are ok) on the rest of us. IDIOTS.
Alert a moderator
fishosaurus
Apr 11th 2009, 12:37
Sorry for double post, didn't think first one succeeded (because maybe too long) so did a shorter version.
Alert a moderator