|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
so i finally caught this on DVD. i tired to put everyone else opinions on the film out of my mind and enjoy it.
Fucking inter-dimensional beings. The only thing that didn't irritate the shit out of me in this film was John Hurt, because he's awesome. This film was terrible. ** 1 just for Hurt.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have watched this again since the cinematic release and it must have been my rose tinted glasses at the cinema. I remember I said it was like a 4/5 film but it's really not very good is it? Oh dear... in my defence at the time I watched it at the cinema I was hideously drunk! I gotta downgrade this to a 2.5/5.
I still really like bits in it but too much just anoyed me on second viewing. And all films should have some ability of longevity if they want to be good! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Buried I totally agree with you, John Hurt was the one and only saving grace for this film!
The CGI monkeys, the escaping a nuclear blast in a fridge, the crap sword fight on two trucks... It was just so shockingly bad...
__________________
"Stay tuned for our special investigative report on the clitoris, "Nature's Rubik's Cube." |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Absolute ****. Comfortably the worst film I've seen from The Beard. I can't even be bothered to mention the fridge.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I heard they were making a 4th film I thought it was a bad idea
, but I had faith, don't know why I did becasue this film was terrible. Completely killed the classic trilogy.Last edited by Ameerah1989; 07-12-2008 at 12:01 AM. Reason: forgot to put a space |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was never a huge Indiana Jones fan. Never got into the Jones/James Bond style adventures, although Last Crusade is really good fun. So I was neither excited nor disappointed by the fact they made a fourth.
But it wasn't great. It felt like it'd been filmed chronologically and Harrison Ford had taken a few weeks to get into the swing of playing Indiana Jones again. His comic timing was also pretty rusty. I cringed at points. Shia LeBeouf's watchable (not sure about Spielberg thinking he's the new Tom Hanks) but again, in this he was no more than that. I needn't cite the monkey scene. How many times did Ray Winstone need to betray/un-betray/re-betray both sides? Cate Blanchett I like, but not in this. Particularly her Standard Evil Eastern-European Accent. Which may be intentional, but it irritated me a bit. Treated John Hurt very badly. He had such dignity and grace in The Elephant Man. Two main problems; The first being the lack of a proper, intruiging MacGuffin, which I guess is what made 1 and 3 successful and 2 less so. The second is the people who have a problem with the fade at the beginning (the mountain-groundhog reference to Raiders). This post makes it seem I hate the film. I don't. It was just...forgettable. Which ain't good. Particularly from a Spielberg film. I'm stunned I managed to remember enough to write the above since I saw the film only once. While a little tired. At midnight on the day of release. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:17 PM.




, but I had faith, don't know why I did becasue this film was terrible. Completely killed the classic trilogy.
Hybrid Mode
