Go Back   TotalFilm Forum > Movie Talk > Movie Players

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 15-01-2011, 10:05 PM
Kiba. Kiba. is offline
Dark Horse Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress View Post
I'd like to see him tackle something a little more off centre, this 'King's Speech' strikes me as pure syrup Oscar baiting stuff.
You don't think A Single Man was off centre?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-01-2011, 07:36 AM
Ancient One Ancient One is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London SE
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
You don't think A Single Man was off centre?
Not so much off centre as missed by a mile. I thought it was cliched to hell and very boring.Turned it off halfway through, the only film I did that to last year.
__________________
Little things used to mean so much to Shelly. I used to think they were kinda trivial. Believe me nothing's trivial.
Eric Draven
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-01-2011, 09:37 AM
Porkchopexpress Porkchopexpress is offline
Honour Guard
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 444
Default

I think by 'off centre' I meant I'd like to see him act in a film that I would actually want to see, 'outstanding performances' are all very well, but if they are not in a film that floats my boat, I'm not going to see it.

Films like 'A Single Man' and 'The King's Speech', while no doubt worthy, with the former being art house fare to a degree, just don't inspire me much. Just not my bag baby.

Give him a shotgun and a a dog rape revenge theme in a blinkered small town suburb in Australia under the jackboot of the Church of Scientology and have it directed by Peter Weir and we can talk, oh and a moustache, he must have a moustache.

My Dad reckons 'The Last Legion' is better than 'Gladiator' too, but then again he has had a stroke.
__________________
"Are you guys mentally challenged? Because, if you are, then I'm certified to teach you baseball."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-01-2011, 11:19 AM
Kiba. Kiba. is offline
Dark Horse Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient One View Post
Not so much off centre as missed by a mile. I thought it was cliched to hell and very boring.Turned it off halfway through, the only film I did that to last year.
By missed by a mile, I take it you mean you didn't like it. I think it hit its target (arthouse) audience perfectly and managed to draw some general attention by being a strong debut.
In what way did you find it cliched? Please elaborate. As far as boring goes, I think when you read what the film is about, you know it's likely to be something you'd be interested in, or not. If you go ahead and see it anyway, at least you gave it a go. As I was watching it, I thought it was the kind of film I'd watch once only because it's sad. But I found it more engaging than, say The Killer Inside Me, which bored me. Killer had some scenes of disturbing violence, but that didn't make it an interesting film. Affleck talking in that trademark monotone of his did not make an inspiring performance. Like anything it's subjective what strikes a note with you and what doesn't.

Last edited by Kiba.; 16-01-2011 at 02:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-01-2011, 11:22 AM
Kiba. Kiba. is offline
Dark Horse Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress View Post
I think by 'off centre' I meant I'd like to see him act in a film that I would actually want to see, 'outstanding performances' are all very well, but if they are not in a film that floats my boat, I'm not going to see it.
As a film fan, it wouldn't hurt to expand your horizons a bit. However, there are some films I have no interest whatsoever in seeing, like that new hoodie thriller, F. Life is short so why waste your time seeing films you know aren't your cup of tea. I'm not really sure what your point is. Firth doesn't star in the kind of gut cruncher films you like to see. Isn't that like saying Robert Englund doesn't do Shakespeare? Would you really expect him to?

But if you don't at least attempt to view these 'too worthy' films then you can't really know what you're talking about as you criticise them. That's the bottom line.

Last edited by Kiba.; 16-01-2011 at 02:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-01-2011, 11:26 AM
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Best Looking Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: still in front of the fire with a single malt
Posts: 627
Default

Absolutely, Kiba, you can't comment on a film you haven't even seen and give it a fair and knowledgeable assessment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient One View Post
Not so much off centre as missed by a mile. I thought it was cliched to hell and very boring.Turned it off halfway through, the only film I did that to last year.
It was a subtle beautiful film with a subtle beautiful performance. There should be more films out there that veer towards subtlety, rather than assuming all audiences have the attention span of a gold fish.
__________________
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16-01-2011, 08:29 PM
Porkchopexpress Porkchopexpress is offline
Honour Guard
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 444
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiba. View Post
But if you don't at least attempt to view these 'too worthy' films then you can't really know what you're talking about as you criticise them. That's the bottom line.


Oh absolutely I agree, I can't have a true opinion on them, having not seen either, but in a multi-media saturated environment of trailers, interviews, articles and other peoples opinions, it's hard to remain objective and not form an opinion on the material.

My cynical gut just gets a gag reflex at Oscar baiting fare, but as for broadening my horizons, I'm not likely to see a film just for the sake of broadening them. I'm fairly receptive and open to most things, just not to the tune of coughing up £5-7 for the privilege.

My point is, I think, is Firth's back catalogue hasn't included anything to my own personal taste, I'm not a Clive Owen fan for instance, but 'Children of Men' is one of my favourite films of recent years. I just need to find him in something that appeals to me.
__________________
"Are you guys mentally challenged? Because, if you are, then I'm certified to teach you baseball."
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-01-2011, 08:43 AM
jaykays hat jaykays hat is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,263
Default

Well done to Mr Firth for getting a Golden Globe.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-01-2011, 01:10 PM
Kiba. Kiba. is offline
Dark Horse Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress View Post
My cynical gut just gets a gag reflex at Oscar baiting fare, but as for broadening my horizons, I'm not likely to see a film just for the sake of broadening them. I'm fairly receptive and open to most things, just not to the tune of coughing up £5-7 for the privilege.
Of course, and I feel the same way. But sometimes, if something comes on TV or Sky and therefore costs me little extra money or effort, I'll try something which is outside the usual watch zone if you see what I mean.

Quote:
My point is, I think, is Firth's back catalogue hasn't included anything to my own personal taste, I just need to find him in something that appeals to me.
Fair do's. Although if you're not keen on broadening those horizons it seems unlikely he'll hit on a film you want to see. Looking over his IMDb list, he's had a fairly varied career but it is light on films in which cars race, robots explode and people rape dogs. Poor him, eh?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-01-2011, 01:51 PM
morris morris is offline
Old Guard Cat
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Herts
Posts: 1,726
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porkchopexpress View Post
My cynical gut just gets a gag reflex at Oscar baiting fare, .
My feeling about Oscar baiting fare is this: judge the film on whether it appeals to you, not the Academy. Otherwise you're allowing them influence over you and they don't deserve that.
As long as it's not about a terminal illness or some race issue/white guilt thing, I draw the line there.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.