Go Back   TotalFilm Forum > Movie Talk > Movie Players

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31-08-2010, 08:42 PM
thedude thedude is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 618
Default Worst Screen Performance (from a usually decent actor)

Why not? We've done best, whats the worst you have seen on the big screen, most importantly, why?

Me first.

Eli Roth in Inglorious Basterds. What a sham this guy is, he's dire as a Director, I wonder what made Tarantino think he would be any good as an actor?
And the man has a good eye for the right actor for the right part; Just look at Christoph Waltz.
But the blame cant be put on his shoulders alone, no, most of that goes to Roth himself.
The worst scene is the "Bear Jew" moment, when he is called upon to dispatch some Nazi stooge. What we need is a frighting man, a man who can act his socks off and scare us with his savagery, as much as his victim. Instead we get a hollow, listless, limp wristed display of forced lines and smug grinning, nothing feels natural with this guy. And hes the same throughout the film, even in the daft comedy moments in the cinema when he is pretending to be Italian, its meant to be a lighthearted silly moment before the impending carnage, its totally ruined by his total inability to convey anything.
I've heard that Adam Sandler was in line for the part but had to pull out, shame, despite his comic (if you can call it that) origins he would of been a damn sight better.

Eli Roth you are here by on the list, consider yourself in danger.
__________________
Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!

Last edited by Kiba.; 31-10-2011 at 12:12 PM. Reason: to clarify thread subject
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2010, 01:35 PM
morris morris is offline
Old Guard Cat
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Herts
Posts: 1,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedude View Post
Eli Roth you are here by on the list, consider yourself in danger.
He's in greater danger from std's from Peaches Geldof.

As to the question, I shall have to think. There are so many bad actors, easy to name but we've been there before. It might be more challenging to name those who are not usually appalling but on one certain occasion, turned out a stinker of a performance. I shall come back to this when I has fought.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2010, 02:05 PM
thedude thedude is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 618
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morris View Post
He's in greater danger from std's from Peaches Geldof.

As to the question, I shall have to think. There are so many bad actors, easy to name but we've been there before. It might be more challenging to name those who are not usually appalling but on one certain occasion, turned out a stinker of a performance. I shall come back to this when I has fought.
Thats a grand idea LeChat, far more interesting.
__________________
Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2010, 05:03 PM
Jonesy Jonesy is offline
Best Looking Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: still in front of the fire with a single malt
Posts: 629
Default

It's also very easy to say actors are crud when the material is bad i.e. Twilight. Let's be honest, the actors didn't have much to play with. It ought to be actors who were awful in what was otherwise a fairly decent film.
__________________
"He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2010, 09:32 PM
HardcoreNinja HardcoreNinja is offline
Film Loader
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Newquay
Posts: 62
Default

Well I both agree and disagree, actors have been known to do well out of a poor script, in fact if they can do that they deserve more credibility. Poor story cant always stop a good performance.
__________________
'I dont wanna be a product of my environment, I want my environment to be a product of me.'
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2010, 10:43 PM
fortunesfool fortunesfool is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The other side of the mirror.
Posts: 641
Send a message via MSN to fortunesfool
Default

William Hurt in 'History of violence' - A good performance, just not sure what film he was in.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-09-2010, 08:01 AM
jaykays hat jaykays hat is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,264
Default

Mark Wahlberg in The Lovely Bones, and probably anything else that he has been in.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-09-2010, 09:02 AM
Ancient One Ancient One is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London SE
Posts: 1,040
Default

Quote:
Mark Wahlberg in The Lovely Bones, and probably anything else that he has been in.
Dude thats scary. Unless of course youve read my last post in the film review section.
__________________
Little things used to mean so much to Shelly. I used to think they were kinda trivial. Believe me nothing's trivial.
Eric Draven
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-09-2010, 11:00 AM
jaykays hat jaykays hat is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ancient One View Post
Dude thats scary. Unless of course youve read my last post in the film review section.
Yes I did, you jogged my memory on his bad performance.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-09-2010, 02:27 AM
CastroGiovanni CastroGiovanni is offline
Old Guard
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 41
Default

So, Nic Cage... How do you even begin to single out one of his performances as worse than any of his others?
__________________
"We're all going to die, all of us, what a circus! That alone should make us love each other but it doesn't. We are terrorized and flattened by trivialities, we are eaten up by nothing."

- Charles Bukowski
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:02 AM.