Comments

• • dex2010

    Sep 28th 2012, 13:39

    Cant believe it still got 4 stars on blueray release. This film is a big piece of s**t!

    Alert a moderator

  • chrisfinney

    Sep 28th 2012, 14:36

    So basically, "Questions will be answered", so long as you buy the most expensive version of the film available? f**k off, Ridley. Movie sucked.

    Alert a moderator

  • Indianabones

    Sep 28th 2012, 14:36

    Its not a big piece of sh*t, but as a supposedly pre-quel or seperate film.....he kinda mish mashed that together, its not seperate, and is thoroughly disappointing as a pre-quel! I'd have rather he done and out and out prequel or a completely seperate film altogether!

    Alert a moderator

  • ChrisWootton

    Sep 28th 2012, 14:53

    Will the question "why did you make such a s**t film?" be answered?

    Alert a moderator

  • FBDDaliel

    Sep 28th 2012, 15:32

    I watched this over again the other day. It really is bad. The Faife character made zero sense. All bad a*s, than turns coward at the first sign of NO TROUBLE. Why was even Wickers on the mission?? She acts like shes got some angle, but then we find out she did\t even need to be there. Didn\t want to sit at home running the whole Weyland corp when she could sleep for two years on a mission she had NO FAITH in right? And the xenomorph in the end which looked nothing like it should have? The so called perfect organism basiclly was a random mistake. Black goo> spiked drink> man> woman without uterus> squidbilly> engineer> full grown xenomorph look-alike ?? And what was the androids deal? They stole Lance Hendriksens original idea to introduce Bishop in ALIENS ( him wandering around the ship) , and throughout the movie Fassbender is the most genuine human character of them all. He doesn't seem like a android at all . And Noomis boyfriend? After finding exactly what they hoped they would find after all of 6 min into the landing , he goes on a bender and just looks like he wants no more to do with the mission after the first check of the ruins is cut short by a storm? Where is the logic in that? One more uniterupted day of searching and they all would have found the ship, and living engineer. But nooooo. He didnt find a live one during the first few hours, so screw that, and go of drinking and sulking...... I hear they are planning the sequel : Noomi & Heads excellent adventure. I bet that one will answer a lot of questions ...... This was so disappointing. I totally understand the secrecy surrounding the project. they knew they had messed it up when they stated filming it.......

    Alert a moderator

  • Hadouken76

    Sep 28th 2012, 18:03

    His plans for a new Blade Runner doesn't look that appealing any more.

    Alert a moderator

  • fortunesfool

    Sep 28th 2012, 19:45

    His plans for Blade Runner don't involve Damon Lindelof. Most of the faults with Prometheus are down to the crass, idiotic screenplay.

    Alert a moderator

  • Ali1748

    Sep 29th 2012, 0:37

    It's not a bad movie just disappointing given all the hype and expectations. ^^^^ the real fault is Sir Ridley just doesn't have it anymore.

    Alert a moderator

  • anant

    Sep 29th 2012, 8:40

    thats what i am afraid of Ali748. he just deosnt have it anymore.

    Alert a moderator

  • spid2411

    Sep 29th 2012, 14:23

    I think the real question that needs to be answered is how the director of Alien and Blade Runner made such a pile of c**p. Dreadful script, awful characters (every stereotype in the book) and some laugh out loud moments of utter stupidity (like the bit where the geologist guys just decide to run away when they find the alien skull as they didn't sign up for that apparently - what did they think they were going to find in outer space and where exactly were they running too?). The bit where they set fire to the guy (who was poisoned by Fassbender for no apparent reason) was just ludicrous and they all got over that pretty quick too. Baffles me how much chat there has been trying to solve the oh so clever mystery behind such a terrible, terrible film. When you have a movie that is supposed to explore the origins of mankind and the only character of note is A ROBOT....well, pretty much says it all. ps can't WAIT to see that Blade Runner sequel...

    Alert a moderator

  • 2Dglasses

    Sep 29th 2012, 17:35

    I can tolerate a disappointing film, but to suggest that the extra special/expensive whatever edition 'answers the questions'...shows nothing but contempt for the fans. The cinema version is supposed to answer the questions, then the DVD maybe shows things that might have been interesting but would have took too long to explain. Is there a deleted scene explaining the motivations of half the characters, which are either inconsistent or nonsensical, merely doing what was dramatic rather than what made sense? Watched Alien on big screen the other day, only showed to prove how poorly constructed this film was. On this plus side, it looked fantastic.

    Alert a moderator

  • Eggman72

    Oct 1st 2012, 10:28

    Questions will be answered..heres one for ya Riddlely...Why was it a piece of s*#t ?? ..Mr Scott really dropped the ball on this one....utter tripe...

    Alert a moderator

  • stephenfranklin

    Oct 11th 2012, 20:40

    Great movie

    Alert a moderator