In Time


Are you rich enough to have a long life or will your time run out?

Andrew Niccol’s sci-fi actioner has a grabby premise: in the future, everyone lives for only 25 years before a digital clock on their forearm starts counting down the time they have left.

With the remaining minutes traded as currency, the rich live forever and the poor die young.

Unfortunately, a grabby premise is all it is, the film quickly turning into a boring chase through a bland tech world as Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried try to beat the system by running everywhere. Ace mother-in-law gag, mind.

Film Details

User Reviews

    • matthewbrady

      Jul 3rd 2014, 22:21


      When Will Salas is falsely accused of murder, he must figure out a way to bring down a system where time is money - literally - enabling the wealthy to live forever while the poor, like Will, have to beg, borrow, and steal enough minutes to make it through another day. Justin Timberlake isn't that bad as a actor that I thought he was, I mean he is actually a fine actor and he did okay here. The movie wasn't that good but it's not terrible. the story is new and the acting isn't that bad.

      Alert a moderator

Most Popular